« Leading Lights: Marketing and PR Strategist David Meerman Scott | Main | The Demand Center Breakthrough »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cafe453ef013480599f6a970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 7 Keys to the Kingdom: How to Fully Capitalize on Your Content Investment:

Comments

research paper


Many institutions limit access to their online information. Making this information available will be an asset to all.

Carl Woolston

Great article. Holistic, right brain thinking is the trend. One of the biggest issues with using content across multiple channels is that nobody internally is thinking unilaterally. Everyone is so busy thinking about their specific role in the business they forget to think about the business.

A question: In your opinion, who is primarily responsible internally to think about cross-platform content utilization?

Mike Barlow

Britton, I agree 100 percent with basic premise, but I think it's also OK for those of us in the "content" business to start raising the bar. We need to define "content" as polished, carefully crafted quanta of business information that conform to reasonably high editorial standards. Why am I suggesting this? Because as we both well know, valuable content can be turned into tepid gibberish with a few keystrokes. All it takes is one well-meaning PR flak or a corporate counsel who doesn't understand that "content" should be treated as a formidable marketing tool -- a competitive weapon that's designed and built to serve a purpose. So I guess my point is this: Those of us who create content for a living must stand up for high standards and resist attempts to conflate "content" with "boilerplate." Content _is_ king, and we need to protect its integrity.

Britton Manasco

Carl, thanks for the comment. You asked who is responsible for thinking about communication across channels. I'm thinking that responsibility primarily falls with the head of marketing -- though larger firms may also have marcom specialists who own the challenge. But, of course, the brand and thought leadership are the CEO's responsibility, too. Depending on the size of the company, he or she may want to take this issue much more personally. Every message the company presents will either get amplified, get ignored or contribute to market cacophony.

Britton Manasco

Beautifully put, Mike. You're right, of course. The integrity of content needs to be defended. Too often, poor content goes unnoticed. Great content, on the other hand, tends to get an audience. Top decision makers shouldn't accept excuses. If existing content is not generating positive feedback -- attention, inquiries, leads, sales results -- it's probably time to take a closer look at how rich and relevant one's existing content is. Maybe it's time for a new approach.

Jenny

I agree with Mike above.

Now that more companies are producing the seven types of content that Britton mentioned above, steps need to be taken to make sure the quality is high.

Nothing irritates me more than getting a white paper or case study that is nothing more than a reformatted brochure.

karthik nagendra

Rightly posted by Mike. Unlike older times, packaging plays a critical role in thought leadership marketing now. Instead of the old ways of just publishing a whitepaper, companies can look at different approaches like creating a visually appealing ebook on the report, have a mini version of the report captured in a blog & have link to full report, have flash videos created which can have key points of reports along with some SMEs giving interviews & perspectives, run polls on the study. last but not the least promoting thru social media channels is a critical aspect. i think unlike olden days technology enablement have just widened the potential for thought leadership marketing.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment