« Confronting the Guidance Imperative | Main | Naked Emperors -- and their PR Firms »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cafe453ef0120a5764adc970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mastering the Customer Success Cycle:

» A Unified Theory of Marketing Communications, Marketing, Sales, Service—and Customer Success from High-Tech Communicator
In his thought-provoking recent post, Mastering the Customer Success Cycle, Britton Manasco suggests that companies extend their conception of the sales cycle/buying process into a more expansive view that he calls the Customer Success Cycle. Instead o... [Read More]

Comments

Mike Barlow

Excellent post covering a subject that should be required at every business school. Two challenges: 1) Monetizing the "guidance relationships" implicit in such a model and 2) Finding talent to staff the functional areas of the enterprise in which these absolutely critical "guidance" activities occur.

Jeff Ogden

Love this post. Spot on perfect. Companies don't buy products, they buy business improvement. Business improvement does not end when they cut a check.

Very well said.

Jeff Ogden
http://www.findnewcustomers.net
htto\p://www.fearlesscompetitor.com

Brian Massey

What really starts to cook a marketer's noodle is when you see consumption of information--typically seen as an Engagement-stage tool--as a Commitment.

When the prospect consumes a report on your product or industry, they essentially become a customer of your "communication product." When they then attend a Webinar, they become a repeat customer.

So, each "communication product" could have an Implementation, Performance and Advocacy strategy.

In the example of a report, a follow-up "what did you think" email might suffice for implementation support. An executive summary might suffice as a Advocacy strategy, helping the reader to share the main points with other team members.

Imagining that each communication product (usually paid for with attention) has a success lifecycle will increase the value of your communications.

Scott Mersy

Really nice post. Thanks for calling it out to me on Twitter. The fact is that, especially in a SaaS or other subscription model, without the full spectrum of the Customer Success Cycle you describe so well, the business model doesn't pan out.

If sales is only selling the product and not the success of the business, they won't have the customer long enough to make the customer profitable. Just another reason that SaaS subscription models are increasingly attractive.

Scott Mersy
Genius.com Inc

Thomas E. Lah

Great post Britton. I believe economics are the accelerator here. As product companies struggle with eroding product margins, they become much more motivated to truly enable the customer success cycle. Over the next decade, expect big changes in the sales/marketing motion of technology companies.

Don Peppers

Very nice post, Britton,thanks! I really do think you've hit on something when you talk about incorporating the service team into the actual sales cycle. So often, companies really don't get it when it comes to the fact that the sale itself is just the beginning of the customer relationship, rather than the end of the sales cycle.

Still, I do have a nit to pick. I think we are misusing the term "engagement" here.

"Engagement" should mean something other than a nice warm fuzzy feeling. I'm not opposed to the whole idea of the "success cycle" in selling to a customer, but I would respectfully submit that the word "engagement" is not well deployed in your post.

I know this is somewhat self-promoting, but I've been fooling around with this problem for a while, and I would like to refer everyone to a blog post and discussion on the issue. Please feel free to pile on here: http://www.peppersandrogersgroup.com/blog/2009/08/defining-engagement-for-custom.html

Aaron Fleming

Interesting post indeed. I think one of the main causes of dislocation between sales and marketing actually lies in the leads themselves.

The traditional model seems to dictate that leads should be individuals in targeted roles in targeted industries (Functional). Focusing instead on individuals and companies that exhibit a specific behavior (behavioral) allows a sales organization to prospect those who already demonstrate a need for what they have to offer.

As an example, you mentioned Infusionsoft as a company that targets the small- and mid-size enterprise market. Instead of such a broad target market, they should focus on companies that need to combine CRM, email marketing, and ecommerce into one platform. They should start by focusing exclusively on companies that already use a CRM (i.e. salesforce) and already have a provider for email marketing (i.e. constant contact), and have an ecommerce presence. Companies that demonstrate these behaviors would clearly benefit from Infusionsoft's service, and should be who marketing is focused on identifying.

Revenue Generation

Very informative post Britton! We blogged on the current sales pipeline/cycle, http://www.leadliaison.com/best-practices/lead-management/sales-pipeline/, but your post stretches the mind. Where our cycle falls short is after the "customer" phase. There's lots of good stuff to be extracted from companies once you get them to the advocacy stage. For example, press releases, referrals, quotes, testimonials, joint speaking opportunities and more. Excellent post to drive a paradigm shift from sales cycle to customer success cycle.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment