In their recent
book Get Content, Get Customers, Joe Pulizzi and Newt Barrett make a powerful case
for what they call “content marketing.” Their objective is to show how marketers
can – and must – turn content into a powerful asset for generating leads and
closing business. “No longer is it necessary to buy ads to get your message
out,” they write. “Today, marketers can be the media. Businesses, both large and
small, have the opportunity to create their own valuable, relevant and
compelling content that turns prospects into buyers.” Pulizzi is the publisher
of the highly trafficked Junta42 blog, which identifies trends in content
marketing, and founder of Junta42 Match, an online service that pairs marketers
with custom publishers. Since its launch last summer, the service has matched
parties for more than 100 content projects. I spoke with Pulizzi recently about
his perspectives on today’s “content revolution” and its implications for B2B
marketers.
Absolutely. What I’m seeing and what
marketers I deal with are telling me is that relevant content strengthens their
marketing efforts. When people go to a search engine and they go to a website,
they find content that helps them identify an answer to their problem. What it’s
done is it’s disrupted the whole sales and marketing cycle. Whereas customers
used to look to sales reps and distributors for buying information, the B2B
complex sales cycle has changed because so much is in the hands of customers
now. They are finding that information on their own. It’s completely changed
the cycle, turning it on its head. They’ll now come down to their two, three or
four vendors themselves without having to do an RFP – just by going online and
searching.
Right. The buyers
are essentially moving down decision cycles on their own through the research
they conduct online.
I guess the question is: Will you be
completely forgotten if you don’t have valuable and relevant content out there?
By the time they’re ready to start seriously talking to companies that can
provide a solution, you’re just not considered one of the meaningful players if
you haven’t reached them with relevant content.
You discuss both B2B and B2C companies in your work on content marketing. What is the difference between B2B and B2C in this regard?
Right. That’s reality. Well, what
are you going to do about that? You have to make sure you have tons and tons of
really good content. I think most companies are good at creating information
about their products. They’ve done that for years. Just take the stuff that you
had in your brochures and put it online and maybe create some new interactive
ways for them to get that content. But that’s really not what today’s prospects
really need. What they need to know is how you are going to solve their
problems. That’s where content marketing comes in. You’ve got to be really
educational. But then, at the end of the day, how’s it going to help you
accomplish your marketing goals? Buyers are fine with you selling to them, but
only if you’re giving them very valuable, relevant, compelling
content.
If it’s artfully
executed, perhaps there’s never a point at which somebody feels like they’re
being sold to.
Oh, I would agree with that. What
I’m seeing happen is marketers starting to understand that their companies can
be the trusted media source – talking one-on-one with customers. They don’t have
to go through anybody. They can educate their customers and prospects so that
they become the trusted solution provider. If I am a marketer for a design
software company like Autodesk, I can produce content that discusses trends in
design engineering and I can distribute that content in multiple channels. When
buyers are ready to buy, they will look to us for guidance and direction
first.
You’ve also noted
in your work that traditional media channels and relationships are disappearing.
What opportunity does that present?
It’s a really good point and gets to
the whole role of the salesperson today. It’s completely changed because a lot
of that prospecting and cold-calling that you used to do have gone away. As a
lot of these marketing organizations become a little bit more sophisticated and
generate leads online, you, as a sales professional, are in there to really help
the buyer make that final decision.
As I see it, more and more
organizations are waking up and they’re saying, “We need content.” Some always
knew they needed content, but didn’t realize they needed a content strategy.
They are starting to realize they must plan for content all along the way. So
what they’re doing is they’re creating editorial calendars very similar to the
way media companies have done for years. But they’re doing it on an ad hoc
basis. Some have newsletters and some have magazines but now they have to look
at it on an enterprise-wide basis and say, “We have to have content all over the
place in all different forms and channels.” Plus, add in the social media stuff.
You can’t have a successful social media program unless you have really good
content. I’m a firm believer in that. If you don’t have something valuable
behind that social media presence, good luck.
I believe you’re going to have
organizations like Oracle or Microsoft that start creating content engines.
They’ll start hiring high-quality journalists and actively create their own
content. Big companies are going to have to do that because it’s going to make a
lot more sense for them just to start hiring talent. I think small- and
mid-sized companies who can’t afford to hire on all this talent will continue to
outsource. But the big companies will have their own editorial content
departments.
Why does it make
more sense for those companies? What’s the
difference?
I think it comes down to the
expertise they can afford. Small- and mid-sized companies will be challenged by
the growing demands. You have to understand SEO and landing pages and
copywriting. You have to understand the value of an interview and storytelling.
You have to understand different channels and how to best to distribute content
through those channels, whether you’re talking about print, online or in person.
It’s just a lot to handle.
How should
companies go about identifying the various types of content they should be
developing and marketing?
The first thing that you have to do
is where they are at right now. What are they doing? What you tend to find is
you have a lot of overlap of content. You have a lot of departments talking
about the same thing. Resources aren’t being used effectively. You’ve got
different messages coming out of different departments. So you have to spend
some time getting a handle on what’s going on in the company. You need to know
what’s working. How are you measuring the impact of your current efforts?
Then, you need to clarify what you
are trying to accomplish from an organizational standpoint. What are your
objectives? Yes, you want to focus on the customer. But, at the end of the day,
you’re a marketer and you need to sell stuff. You better be profitable and you
better be driving business.
So what are you doing now? What are
the informational needs of your customers? And what are you trying to
accomplish? You’ll need to know those three things to begin creating a content
marketing strategy.
You’ve made the
case that three are many types of firms – such as custom content firms, public
relations firms and direct marketing firms – that will fight it out to provide
content marketing services in the coming years. Could you elaborate?
Well, let’s start with the custom
publishers because they think this is their domain. They’ve been taking the
storytelling approach. They started by developing custom print publications and
then they made the transition online.
Then you have PR folks that
understand the value of a story but maybe haven’t looked at the channel
distribution like this before or concentrated on interaction with a very
targeted group of people.
And then you have the direct
marketers who’ve been doing a lot of direct communication for years but really
haven’t looked at content quite this way. You don’t really have an “offer” all
the time when you’re talking about content marketing.
And then you’ve got advertising
agencies and you’ve got you’ve got SEM or SEO and interactive groups.

Great column. I create original content for content-driven marketing programs, and I love the look in the eyes of an audience when I'm presenting on the subject and they get it. What surprises me, though, is that content-driven marketing has to be explained to people -- especially when you consider that content-driven marketing was probably the first kind of marketing. "The Illiad" and "The Odyssey" are the original marketing platforms for Western Civilization. Lots of blood and sex to grab the attention, and then careful messaging woven into practically every line. Homer was a marketing genius, and we've forgotten the power of a good story to sell a brand. I'm glad that guys like Joe and Newt are helping us "re-invent" an extremely effective form of marketing!
Posted by: Mike Barlow | February 06, 2009 at 04:42 AM